GHG Emissions and Agriculture

In a previous post we touched on the livestock sector's impact on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Today, let's examine GHG emissions from the agricultural sector as a whole.

Emissions from agriculture occur in the form of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). CH4 and N2O are the most important sources of GHG emissions from agriculture, the agricultural sector contributing over 50% of the total amount anthropogenic emissions of these gases (Cole et al., 1997). Between 1990 and 2005, agricultural emissions of CH4 and N2O increased by 17%, equal to a an average annual emission rate of increase of approximately 60 megatonnes of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2-eq) per year (IPCC, 2007).

Agricultural fields in Brazil as seen from space (source: the Guardian)

Agricultural lands occupy approximately 40-50% of the Earth's land surface (IPCC, 2007), and can be clearly seen from space (e.g. above photo). Food systems today are so important that they contribute between 19 and 29% of the world's human-induced GHG emissions. Together, agriculture and forestry account for as much as one third of global GHG emissions (CGIAR, 2012). In 2008, approximately 9,800-16,900 MtCO2-eq were released from agricultural practices, agricultural production (including land cover change) comprising 80 to 86% of all food system emissions (Vermeulen, 2012).

Global agricultural emissions (CGIAR, 2013)

Various stages in the food production system are responsible for GHG emissions, as can be seen from the diagram above. The main three stages in the production of food include preproduction, production, and postproduction. By and large, the production stage which includes both direct and indirect emissions from agriculture contributes the largest portion of emissions. Within these stages of the food chain, regional variations exists with high-income countries contributing most to the postproduction stage (Vermeulen, 2012). 

Thornton (2012) argues that the effects of climate change will greatly affect the agricultural sector, and examines 22 common agricultural commodities' responses in the face of climate change. He states that "the world's agricultural system faces an uphill struggle", and that it will become a great challenge to feed global populations (as we saw with Foley, 2009). He also finds that the production of the most common commodity crops (wheat, maize, and rice) will be challenged by new weather patterns, as will the raising of livestock and catching of fish (two of the more common sources of protein). The Telegraph recently reported on the fact that the UK is now an importer of wheat because of large swings in weather conditions, exemplifying Thornton's (2012) findings (you can read the article here).

The UK was forced to switch from being an exporter of wheat to an
importer in 2013 (from the Telegraph)

At this point in our examination of current food systems, I'd like to take a little journey backwards in time. Remember when we talked about the origins of agriculture in November? We saw that the advent of agriculture about 10,000 years ago greatly altered human societies, and also the environment. What we didn't talk about was the early anthropogenic hypothesis, proposed by Ruddiman in 2003. Contrary to the popular notion that the Anthropocene began 150 to 200 years ago, altering the climate system by inputting CO2 and CH4 at industsrial rates, Ruddiman suggests that this transition in fact occurred thousands of years ago when agriculture was born. His three main arguments are that a) CO2 and CH4 concentrations anomalously began to increase 8,000 and 5,000 years ago, respectively; b) published explanations exist for mid- to late-Holocene gas increases which reject natural forcing; and c) wide arrays of archaeological, cultural, historical, and geologic evidence are available which point to anthropogenic impacts from early agriculture (in Eurasia in particular). Ruddiman's hypothesis is often criticised (see Ruddiman, 2007), but I thought it was worth mentioning and this post seemed like a good venue.

Regardless of when agriculture began to impact the climate system, it is clear that global food production is greatly contributing to climate change by inputting large amounts of GHGs into the atmosphere. The great challenge will be to produce enough food to feed the growing world, but at what cost? How will we manage to do so without imposing great climate change threats? If you're interested in mitigation strategies, you can read about it in chapter 8.4 of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report (AR4).

Thanks for reading, and have a Happy New Year!

Indigenous Fruits and Vegetables

Today's post is a quick little aside before we go on to explore GHG emissions from the agricultural sector as a whole later on in the week...

I was leisurely browsing the online world of food news this afternoon and came across this interesting article in the Guardian. The title, Healthy eating: nutritious indigenous foods you may never have heard of particularly caught my eye given the festive holiday season. After having eaten my fair share of sweets and decadent foods over the past week (and surely for the next week to come), I tend to get overly enthusiastic when I see articles with the word 'healthy' in their titles! 

Perinaldo artichokes (source: the Guardian)

The article describes a list of indigenous fruits and vegetables created by Food Tank: The Food ThinkTank that could present healthier alternatives to modern-day staples. The rationale behind the creation of the list is that the Western diet, which is rich in refined sugars, fats, processed grain and meat has taken over the world over the past three decades (e.g. Bonhommeau et al., 2013). This dietary shift has been linked with increased chronic disease incidence, including obesity and cardiovascular disease (Cordain, 2005). Organisations, such as the World Vegetable Center, are working to catalogue these indigenous foods, because many have been replaced and even lost as traditional diets are being replaced by Western diets. 

Amaranth (source: the Guardian)

The list includes some well known indigenous fruits and vegetables such as amaranth and argan (Africa), artichokes (Europe), okra, mungbean and lemongrass (Asia), and apples (Americas), as well as many others which I'd never heard of before (such as papalo from the Americas, which has a skunk-like smell and is known to regulate blood pressure and relieve stomach disorders).

Given that we recently touched on the Western diet when we examined the livestock sector, I thought that sharing this article would be a nice little break from all the hard-hitting environmental facts surrounding our food system. I'll be back to discuss the very imposing issue of GHG emissions from agriculture in a few days' time, so do check back soon.

For those of you that have come to study in the UK from abroad, are there any healthy traditional foods that are being replaced due to the emergence of a Western diet? I can't think of any examples from Canada off the top of my head, but I'll share in the comments if I come up with anything.

Thanks for reading!

The Other Inconvenient Truth

While researching the environmental impacts of increased meat consumption, I came across an excellent TED Talk by Jonathan Foley titled The Other Inconvenient Truth. He describes the current state of the food system and identifies the need for future solutions so that we can feed 9 billion people by 2040. He covers some examples of the environmental impacts of  the modern agricultural system, including the drying of the Aral Sea and rainforest degradation in South America. His talk provides a really nice review of some of the information covered in Are Humans Becoming More Carnivorous? as well as a nice segue into some of the future topics that we'll be exploring here.

If you have twenty minutes to spare, you can check out his talk below.

If not, here's the short and compelling clip that Jonathan shows at the end of his talk.

Thanks for reading!

Are Humans Becoming More Carnivorous? Environmental Impacts

In the previous post, we examined a new study by Bonhommeau et al. (2013) which revealed that global meat consumption has increased over the past five decades. How does an increase in meat consumption affect the environment?

Cows (photo from Living Green Magazine)

The livestock sector lies within the top two or three of the most important contributors to environmental issues, both locally and globally. Despite not being a major global economic player, the livestock sector is beneficial and crucial to society, employing and feeding growing global populations (Steinfeld et al., 2006; Herrero et al., 2009). Livestock agriculture contributes to environmental problems such as land degradation, land use change, climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, water shortage and pollution, nutrient excretion, loss of biodiversity, and competition for human food (Steinfeld et al., 2006; Janzen, 2011). These environmental impacts are driven by growing stresses on global human populations, namely the those of food, water, and energy security, biogeochemical interferences, and habitat (Janzen, 2011).

Let's now examine some of these impacts in a bit more detail. Many of the other impacts mentioned above will be the topics of future posts.

Land Use Change and Degradation

Land use refers to the ways in which land is used for human means. It is "characterised by the arrangements, activities and inputs that people undertake in a certain land cover type to produce change, or maintain it" (FAO, 2013). Land degradation refers to the reduction of resources as a result of processes which act on the land, including soil erosion, deterioration of the properties of the soil, and loss of natural vegetation (Steinfeld et al., 2006).

Deforestation for agriculture in Brazil's Pantanal wetland 
(from JNCC, 2013)

Livestock now represents the largest portion of human land use forms, affecting ecosystems around the world (Janzen, 2011). An example of environmental problems brought on by land use change for agriculture is the degradation of tropical rainforests, such as the Amazon. Two main phenomena are related to deforestation as a result of intensive raising of livestock, the first being the direct conversion of forest to pasture land and the second being the clearing of forest for crop growth to feed livestock (Herrero et al., 2009). Approximately 20-30% of the Earth's land surfaces are used for grazing, while approximately one third of cultivated land area is used to feed livestock (Janzen, 2011). 

GHG Emissions & Climate Change

Climate change is possibly the most pressing environmental challenge that has faced the planet. According to the IPCC (2013), the main authority on climate change, the "warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia". This warming can be seen in the atmosphere, the ocean, the cryosphere, in sea level, and in carbon and biogeochemical cycles. The largest contributor to total radiative forcing is caused by the increases in anthropogenic GHGs, such as CO2, since 1750.

Disintegrating iceberg near West Greenland
(from The Guardian)

Animal agriculture produces GHG emissions in the form of CH4 from enteric fermentation, N2O from fertiliser use, CH4 and N2O from manure management practices, and CO2 from from fossil fuel and energy use (O'Mara, 2011) and land use and its changes (Herrero et al., 2009). Livestock induced emissions account for 2.4 billion tonnes of CO2 per year, and on a life cycle analysis basis, they contribute up to 18% of global GHG emissions (Steinfeld et al., 2006). 

Water Shortage and Pollution

Water is essential for life. Only 3% of the water on Earth is fresh, and surface water only accounts for 0.3% of the total amount of freshwater (this includes lakes, rivers, and streams). Another 68.7% of all freshwater is locked away in glaciers, while 30% of freshwater is located within the pores of the ground in the form of groundwater (US EPA, 2013). Approximately 64% of the world's population is expected to live in water-stressed basins by 2025 (Steinfeld et al., 2006).

Water shortage in China (photo from The Guardian)

Freshwater is extensively used in livestock agriculture, the most significant use coming from the irrigation of crops for intensive feeding operations. The livestock sector is a key player in increasing water use and represents 8% of global human water use (Steinfeld et al., 2006). For instance, approximately 16,000L of water are needed to produce 1kg of beef (Janzen, 2011). In terms of water pollution, the major sources from the livestock sector include animal waste, antibiotics and hormones, chemicals from tanneries, fertilisers and pesticides for feedcrops, and sediments from eroded pastures. These pollutants contribute to freshwater eutrophication, coastal dead zones, and the degradation of coral reefs, among others (Steinfeld et al., 2006).

As I mentioned above, these are only some of the many environmental impacts of livestock agriculture. Livestock's Long Shadow by Steinfeld et al. is currently the most comprehensive study on the environmental impacts of the livestock sector. I strongly recommend flipping through it if you're eager to learn more on the topic.

Having read about some of the environmental impacts arising from the livestock sector, what do you think are potential solutions for a more sustainable food industry? 

Thanks for reading!

Are Humans Becoming More Carnivorous?

Photo courtesy of Farming America

At the beginning of December, Nature News published an article titled Humans are becoming more carnivorous. The article discussed how global meat consumption has increased since the 1960s. The article describes the findings of a new study, Eating up the world's food web and the human trophic level published by Bonhommeau et al. (2013) in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Bonhommeau et al. (2013) used the trophic level concept to quantify human diets. Trophic levels are often used to define the roles of species in ecosystems by describing the energy levels associated with primary producers, secondary producers, and tertiary producers (Kercher and Shugart, 1975). Species belonging to the lowest trophic levels are primary producers (e.g. algae, plants), and species belonging to the highest trophic levels are top predators. When moving from one trophic level to another, a loss in energy occurs (Kozlovsky, 1968). Bonhommeau et al. (2013) calculated the Human Trophic Level (HTL) for the very first time using human food supply per food item per capita per year national data from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). The data represent 98.1% of the world population between 1961 and 2009.

Their results indicate a 3% increase in HTL since 1961 (as shown in the figure below). By using a weighted average to represent different countries' populations, the researchers found that much of this increase was driven by China and India (HTL increase of 7.4%). 

A) Trends in the HTC (1961-2009) and B) Map of the median HTC level over 2005-2009 (Bonhommeau et al., 2013) 

Although there is a considerable amount of inter-country variability within the results, cluster analysis has shown that there are five different groups of HTLs:

The first group includes sub-Saharan countries and Southeast Asia and exhibits patterns of low and stable HTLs due to that fact that populations in these regions have mainly plant-based diets. The second group includes countries from Asia, Africa, South America, including China and India, and exhibits low but increasing HTLs. The third group includes Central America, Brazil, Chile, Southern Europe, several African countries, and Japan. It has higher HTLs than group 2 and exhibits an increasing trend. The fourth group includes North America, Northern and Eastern Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, and has high and stable HTLs until 1990 which increase thereafter. Finally, the fifth group possesses the highest overall HTLs and decreasing trends, and includes Iceland, Scandinavia, Mongolia, and Mauritania.

In addition to the trends described above, the results found by Bonhommeau et al. (2013) challenge the classic view of humans as top predators - based on their analysis, humans were placed on the same trophic level as anchoveta and pigs (level of 2.21). The researchers also found that the trophic level of terrestrial animals consumed by humans has only slightly increased, while the trophic level of marine food items has decreased due to declines in the mean trophic level of marine fisheries catches. 

When I first read the article in Nature News, I was a little bit surprised to learn that global meat consumption has increased despite so much recent emphasis on meat consumption reduction, for example through campaigns such as Meat Free Mondays. However, reading through the results, the numbers do add up. When looking at the bigger picture and taking into account the economies of different countries, we still see a growing preference for a western-style diet. 

What does a global increase in meat consumption imply? I'll be back to explore the potential environmental impacts in the next post.

Thanks for reading!

Food Waste Follow-Up, and a Recipe

Before going on to explore some of the modern environmental impacts of global food production, here's an update on my October post about food waste in the news.

What's been going on since then? A report was released by WRAP in November which builds upon their previous research. The results for 2012 were quite interesting: the amount of food waste decreased by 21% between 2007 and 2012, but 4.2 million tonnes of food were still wasted during the year (approximately equal to £12.5 billion). In terms of environmental impacts, avoidable food waste from the UK was associated with approximately 17 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent. In addition, estimates of the amount of land required to produce the food that is wasted were created for the first time. The total land area was found to be approximately 91% of the size of Wales.

Globally, food waste accounts for more greenhouse gas emissions than any country, with the exception of the US and China. In a recent report, the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) created figures on the carbon footprint associated with food waste which were estimated at 3.3 billion tonnes of CO2 per year. These results are quite distressing and underline the urgent need for a global strategy for a sustainable food system. In their recent study, Godfray et al. (2010) discuss possible solutions for sustainable agricultural intensification, but identify that there is no clear-cut solution. With growing global populations, the issue of food waste is one that will not quickly disappear.

In other food waste related news, The Ecologist recently wrote a piece about the Pig Idea in their article titled Let them eat waste! In November, a knees-up was hosted in Trafalgar Square by the organisation where eight pigs fed entirely on food waste were devoured. The Pig Idea endeavours to get the feeding of food waste to livestock back on the table to avoid unnecessarily growing animal feed. According to studies by Myer et al. (1999) and Westendorf et al. (1998), food waste has nutritional value and could be used in swine diets without compromising the quality and flavour of the meat. What are your thoughts on feeding food waste to livestock? 

Does all this make you eager to take action on food waste in your daily life? Check if your council provides food waste recycling services - Camden, for instance, provides an excellent food recycling service. Here's an informative little video on two different ways food waste can be recycled, namely in-vessel composting and anaerobic digestion. For more information on the effectiveness of these two methods of composting, see Kim et al. (2008) and Righi et al. (2013) respectively.

Aside from composting, there are other things you can do to improve your waste footprint. Not sure what to do with the vegetables in the bottom of your fridge that are almost at the end of their lives? An excellent way to use up old vegetables is to make a pot of soup - aside from reducing food waste, soups are very healthy, cheap and easy to make, and last a long time. To conclude this post, I'd like to share with you one of my favourite lentil soup recipes from a local restaurant called The Green Door in my hometown of Ottawa.

Thanks for reading!

Green Lentil Soup 

Recipe from the Green Door Vegetarian Cookbook

Ingredients:

1c green lentils
4c water
2 tbsp olive oil
1 diced onion
2 stalks diced celery
1 diced carrot
8c water or stock
1 clove garlic
3 bay leaves
1 tsp salt
1/2c chopped parsley

1. Wash and drain lentils, and place in pot. Add 4 cups water and bring to a boil. Lower heat and cook for 5 minutes, then drain.

2. In a soup pot, heat oil, saute onion, carrot, and celery until soft. 

3. Add water or stock and bring to a boil. 

4. Add lentils, garlic, bay leaves and salt (if using). 

5. Cook for 20 minutes or until lentils are well cooked. Adjust seasoning if necessary.

6. Serve topped with parsley, and enjoy!

The Anthropocene, Continued

As a complement to my last post on the Anthropocene, I'm sharing this TEDx Talk given by Professor Will Steffen of the Australian National University Climate Change Institute. Having made reference to his work quite a bit here on the blog, I found it very interesting to listen to him lecture on the Anthropocene. I hope you'll enjoy it as much as I did!

The Anthropocene and the Industrial Revolution

The next chapter in our story of global food production through time brings us to the Holocene, and more specifically, to the last few centuries of our present geologic epoch. Before exploring the modern environmental impacts of global food production, this post will highlight some of the background on modern global environmental change by examining the Anthropocene, the Industrial Revolution, and the Great Acceleration.

Source: Images of the Industrial Era in Great Britain

The Anthropocene

The dramatic increase in human-induced environmental change over the past three centuries has led to the recognition of a new geologic epoch, the Anthropocene (Ellis, 2011; Crutzen, 2002; Steffen et al., 2007; Zalasiewicz et al., 2011). This novel geologic epoch is still informal, and its start date is currently being debated by scientists. However, the term is generally tied to the period of time associated with the alteration of the Earth's lithosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere by means of collective human activities. The term Anthropocene signifies "the recent age of man" and is derived from Greek (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2013). One possible starting point that has been suggested for the Anthropocene is the onset of the Industrial Revolution (IR) (Crutzen, 2002; Price et al., 2011; Steffen et al, 2007).  

The Industrial Revolution (Stage 1 of the Anthropocene?)

The IR mechanised the world by altering economies to become driven by industry and machine manufacture. The movement originated in Great Britain between 1760 and 1830, and later spread to other areas of the world. The main technological features of the IR include the use of new base materials (iron and steel), as well as the use fossil fuels (coal, in particular) as energy sources. In addition, the invention of new machines, the introduction of the factory system, improved communication, and the application of science to industry were all central to the revolution. These technological advances allowed humans to harness a significantly larger amount of natural resources. The IR also allowed for major developments in areas such as agriculture, where it became possible to mass produce food to supply the world's growing populations (Encyclpaedia Britannica, 2013).

Though the IR was undoubtedly advantageous for the growth of global economies and societies, it also contributed to the creation of the environmental problems of our time. The exponential increase in the use of natural resources associated with the IR resulted in the increased input of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere (Price et al., 2011), deforestation and conversion to agriculture in the mid-latitudes (Steffen et al., 2007), the diversion of water in rivers by dams (Steffen et al., 2011), and ocean acidification (Tyrrell, 2011), to name only a few. Kasa (2009) argues that current environmental problems have in fact been created as a result of the development that followed the IR. Kasa (2009) further breaks down the IR into five smaller revolutions, and associates them with their specific environmental impacts, as shown in the figure below. 

The five industrial revolutions and their environmental problems (Kasa, 2009).

The massive explosion that was the IR resulted in the skyrocketing of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel use over the past 150 years, as can be seen from the figure below. Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have increased to levels never experienced before. CO2 concentrations have increased by 40% since pre-industrial times, attributed primarily to fossil fuel emissions and secondarily to net land use change emissions. Today, it is widely accepted by the scientific community that human influence on the climate system is clear (IPCC, 2013).

Annual anthropogenic CO2 emissions from 1750 to 2011 (IPCC, 2013)

The Great Acceleration (Stage 2 of the Anthropocene?)

Following the Second World War, the human enterprise quickly accelerated, as shown by Steffen et al., (2007). The First World War, the Great Depression, and the Second World War were all factors which had the net effect of slowing global population and economic growth. From the middle of the 20th century, sharp increases in human populations, total real GDP, damming of rivers, and fertiliser consumption, among others, can clearly be seen. According to Steffen et al. (2007), almost 75% of the anthropogenically driven increase in CO2 concentration took place since 1950, and nearly 50% of the total increase in CO2 has occurred in the last 30 years.

The change in human enterprise from 1750-2000 (Steffen et al., 2007)

Final Thoughts

How does this all link back to global food production? In short, the IR industrialised all economic spheres, including agriculture. The use of machinery, factories, and fertilisers in the food system were all results of the IR. The Great Acceleration allowed for an exponential growth in food production, and also allowed for the internationalisation of our food system. 

I hope that trough this post, I have provided the background for future posts here at PP&P. The next set of posts will examine some of the impacts of modern global food production. If there's anything you're dying to learn about or simply would like me to find some information for you, please let me know in the comments below!

To conclude this post, I found this very interesting BBC documentary about why the IR occurred in Britain. I definitely recommend it if you'd like to learn a little bit more on the subject.

Thanks for reading!

Progress Report

Having reached the halfway point of the term, I thought it'd be nice to take a step back and have a look at what we've covered here so far. 

The objective that I set out at the beginning of this blogging experience was to examine the environmental impacts of global food production through time. To do this, it was first necessary to understand the origins of agriculture (e.g. Bar Yosef, 1998; Price & Bar Yosef, 2011; Zeder, 2011)  and the environmental impacts associated with the Neolithic Revolution (e.g. Zeder, 2008; Zhou et al., 2011). We are now going to fast-forward several millennia to quickly examine the environmental impacts of the industrial revolution with respect to agriculture. After that, the remainder of the posts will deal with what has been referred to as the Great Acceleration of the Anthropocene (Steffen et al., 2007). We will examine how agricultural production has boomed over the past century to meet the needs of a rapidly growing global population and how this expansion has altered the environment.

During our very first lecture in Global Environmental Change, Professor Mackay showed us a Wordle he had made on the Internationalisation of Science and Technology. For those of you who are unfamiliar with Wordles, they work by assigning different sizes to words from a certain text to denote their importance. Larger words are those that showed up repeatedly throughout the text, while smaller words were those that didn't show up as much. I created the above Wordle using the entirety of the text in Picnics Past and Present to date. The words that showed up the most were food, agriculture, environmental, and diet. 

To evaluate the progress of this blog's content and how it's keeping in line with these objectives, I'll repeat the same exercise in the new year. I'm very interested to see how the picture will change!

I'll be back as promised to introduce the industrial revolution in terms of global food production. Thanks for reading, and have a lovely weekend!

The Paleolithic Diet

A short aside from the origins of agriculture... have you ever heard of the palaeolithic diet, more commonly referred to as the paleo diet?

Photo taken from the BHAC website

The diet was founded by Dr. Loren Cordain of the Colorado State University, and is based on the notion that the most beneficial eating habits for human health are the ones that we are genetically adapted to (i.e. the diet of the hunter gatherer). The diet is supposedly associated with a wide range of health benefits from weight control to the reversal of autoimmune disease (Österdahl et al., 2007; Cordain et al., 2005; Frassetto et al., 2009)

So, what can you eat on the paleo diet? In short, modern foods that replicate what our hunter-gatherer ancestors used to eat. The diet is centred around these following food characteristics:

• Higher protein
• Low carbohydrate and glycemic index
• High fibre
• Moderate to high polyunsaturated fats with Omegas 3 and 6
• High potassium, low sodium
• Alkaline
• High vitamin, mineral, antioxidant, and phytochemical content

For example, the paleo diet allows you to eat food items such as grass-produced meats, fish and seafood, fresh fruits and vegetables, eggs, nuts and seeds, and oils such as olive, flaxseed, and avocado. A "paleo-friendly" meal could be this lemongrass chicken curry.

If this post has piqued your interest and you'd like to learn more about the paleo diet, check out PaleoHacks' post on the top 25 paleo blogs. Although I do think that consuming more foods rich in vitamins, antioxidants, fibre, etc. is important for overall health, I think I'll be sticking to a more modern diet for the time being. The paleo diet also brings up some environmental questions - for example, if the globe's population increased their intake in protein from animal sources, what would be the consequences in terms of global emissions?  

What are your thoughts on the paleo diet?

Environmental Impacts of the Rise of Agriculture

An event as important as the Neolithic Revolution (Bar Yosef, 1998) is one that most certainly leaves a mark. This mark can still be seen today, as the food system many modern human populations rely on continues to revolve around agriculture. The event has been so pivotal, progressivists argue, that it has allowed early human populations to spend less time hunting and gathering, and more time innovating (Diamond, 1987). Were it not for the Neolithic Revolution, would I still be blogging here today? 

An event so monumental for human populations must also have had impacts on the surrounding biotic communities. Zeder (2008) examined the environmental impacts of Neolithic economies in the Mediterranean Basin, which were most important in the large islands of the region. In these locations, domesticated and wild mainland fauna replaced endemic fauna. In Cyprus, for instance, only five endemic species existed before the arrival of humans, namely the pigmy hippopotamus, the pygmy elephant, the genet, and a mouse (Smithsonian Institution, 2013), all of which are now extinct. Zeder (2008) argues that despite the role of humans in the extirpation of endemic island fauna still being unclear due to a lack of definitive evidence, the progressive east-to-west disappearance of these mammals occurring around the time of human colonisation suggests that humans did play a significant role.

Pygmy hippopotamus skull ca. 10,000–8,500 BCE from Aetokremmos
(Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History)

The environmental impacts of the rise of agriculture have also been studied in the other major centres of domestication. Zhou et al., (2011), for example, have shown that an agricultural transition occurred in the Longdong area of China during the Neolithic period. This transition was marked by a shift in early agriculture from producing common millet exclusively to producing other grains including foxtail millet, rice, and soybeans in addition to the common millet. Agricultural civilisations grew rapidly during this period and this expansion altered the Longdong basin ecosystem. Pollen analysis revealed that the predominant effects of the intensification of agriculture in the region were the degradation and simplification of local shrub-grasslands and the expansion of Graminaceae farmlands. Following the abandonment of settlements and agriculture in this location, the ecosystem recovered.

The studies described above are only two of the many examples of the environmental impacts of early agriculture. They highlight that even the earliest agricultural civilisations managed to alter the natural environment, just as we do today albeit at a much larger scale. 

A Field Trip, and Gardens in the City

Dear readers, today I'm going to tell you about a little field trip I went on recently with my friend Elena. We visited Camley Street Natural Park this week, a natural gem right in the heart of King's Cross!

Personally, living in London has been a bit... hectic for me. As a Canadian who's lived in Ottawa, Ontario, for most of her life, I've spent a lot of time surrounded by nature. Taking a break from the city is something I've come to take for granted, from heading up to Gatineau Park just over the Quebec border for a relaxing afternoon to spending weeks in the Laurentians. So naturally, I've been feeling a bit wildlife-depleted since moving here in September. 

Seeking to get my fill of nature, I came across the London Wildlife Trust and their Wildlife on your Waterways project for Central London. The project is based at Camley Street Natural Park, just behind King's Cross on Regent's Canal, and its goal is to protect wildlife along the city's waterways. Elena and I had our first volunteering induction session this week, and we had the opportunity to visit and learn about this fascinating nature reserve. It was a great success, and I'm happy to report that spending a morning at Camley Street Natural Park really does feel like leaving the big city. What's more is that inside the park I found something that is relevant to this blog: food!

Camley Street Natural Park is located on the site of an old coal yard and was created in 1984. The park, vastly changed from what it used to look like before its inception, now has pond, meadow, and woodland habitats. Walking through the park you can admire a wide variety of animals and plants, both native and non-native. The park is extremely popular, and is largely used as an educational site for children. I was very surprised to learn that this site is the first point of contact with nature for many children living in the urban core.

The main goal of the park being the protection of wildlife, I was happily surprised to learn that due to the growing popularity of the site and an increased demand for urban gardens, agricultural activities are now taking place here as well. As you can see in the photo below, the grounds are now also being used for growing food in the community. Gardens are interspersed around the site on raised beds due to the fact that the soil is contaminated from the industrial activities that used to occur here. The use of raised beds prevents the possibility of contaminants, such as heavy metals, of entering the food being grown.

What I found even more impressive is that the site is also home to a floating garden on the canal (photographed below). In previous posts on this blog, we covered topics such as food waste, where food comes from, and how agriculture came to be. I think this little bit of urban garden fits perfectly in this story - it shows us that even in a city as big as London, food can still be grown in a sustainable way that supports the community and the local environment. The site is also an excellent example of environmental change through time: what was once an abandoned contaminated site is now, as you can see, teeming with life.

What are the benefits of urban gardens such as these, you may ask? Studies have shown that the presence of these urban gardens has positive health and environmental impacts, including improved access to food, nutrition, and physical activity, as well as conservation benefits. Wakefield et al. and Goddard et al. respectively discuss these positive impacts in detail.

As I mentioned before, a big part of the project is the conservation of biological diversity along London's waterways. Why not head over to Elena's blog, Invasive Species Are Among Us, to find out about what we learnt on invasive species within the park? Her new post, entitled Invasives of Camley Street Nature Park, is a great read.

I'm leaving you with a video created by Greengage Films and Environment Films on a typical day in the life of Camley Street Natural Park. Follow the link on the photo below to access the video on Vimeo. Thanks for reading, and have a great Sunday!